THE PRISM
A polarization lab for argument reframing, audience mapping, and campaign stress-testing. It lets you test how a stance on AI regulation, urban density, free speech, and more lands across moral foundations and segments – surfacing bridges and consensus language instead of just sharper clashes.
>> STEP 1: DEFINE STANCE
Select a domain and paste the way you actually argue it. The Prism will infer which moral foundations you signal – and which your counterpart is really listening for.
Tip: write it the way you would in a memo, tweet thread, or op-ed – not how you think you should sound.
> detected_topic: "AI Regulation"
> current_frame: "Innovation vs Risk"
> OPPONENT_FRAME: "Existential Security"
>> STEP 2: LATENT VALUE MAP
Your argument relies heavily on Liberty values. Your counterpart may be filtering first for Authority/Security. The radar shows this mismatch.
>> STEP 3: THE COMMON GROUND GENERATOR
The system uses a stripped-down version of moral reframing: it keeps your core position but rotates the language toward the values your counterpart actually tracks. Think of these as drafts for memos, back-channel notes, or talking points – not scripts.
❌ Why You Are Losing
✅ Bridge Variants
Three ways of saying roughly the same thing, aimed at different parts of the moral map.